Mary Xmas (maryxmas) wrote in feminism_ua,
Mary Xmas
maryxmas
feminism_ua

альтернет продолжает радовать

обзор книг, исследующих современные стереотипы о женщинах.
Stereotypes and Archetypes

By Deborah Siegel, The Progressive
January 23, 2004
Reviewed: The Mommy Myth: The Idealization of Motherhood and How It Has Undermined Women by Susan J. Douglas and Meredith W. Michaels. Free Press. 352 pages. $26.

Bitches, Bimbos and Ballbreakers: The Guerrilla Girls' Illustrated Guide to Female Stereotypes by the Guerrilla Girls. Penguin Books. 96 pages. $20.

Differentiating between stereotype ("a box, usually too small, that a girl gets jammed into") and archetype ("a pedestal, usually too high, that she gets lifted up onto"), the authors breeze through scores of both, including those that grow out of religious contexts, those rooted in "real" life, those invented to sell products.

статья про закон по абортам
Remembering Roe
By Joanne Mariner, FindLaw.com
Even though, as the Supreme Court said in 1992, "an entire generation has come of age free to assume Roe's concept of liberty," the right to a safe and legal abortion remains under threat.

No longer focused solely on fetal rights, the anti-abortion lobby now professes concern for "post-abortion victims" – that is, women who have undergone abortions.

про программу способствования бракам среди бедных:
Who Wants to Marry a Marriage Initiative?
By Traci Hukill, AlterNet
The Bush administration's $1.5 billion drive to promote marriage among poor people is being received with joy on the religious right as a sign that George W. Bush is still their man. But the news is meeting a cooler reception everywhere else on the political spectrum. To most on the left and even some on the right, the marriage initiative sounds now just like it did when it emerged three years ago as a component of a new Republican welfare system: patronizing and wrongheaded.

Nevertheless, progressives and libertarians alike see nightmarish figures when they look at the marriage initiative: Big Brother, the Bourgeois Moralizer, the Great Society-Attacker, the Stingy Darwinian Social Engineer, the Politically Pandering Money-Waster and the Crusader for the Inappropriate Introduction of Religion into State Affairs.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments